Another year, another IWD.
International Women’s Day.
(Published in March.)
Why is that such a noise-maker, celebrating **International Women’s Day**, every year — than say, an *International Man’s Day*?
Are there more women, than men?
Are there more noisemakers in the change-zones that are: collating the incidences of that “grid” and the harm that noise actually makes?
At the workplace, there are issues mounting, to enable girls to *“get opportunities”*- when the actual campaigns should be more about getting recognition at the onset: wherever girls are given the spotlight and there’s a consistent target that are always the women at work (since about 2005 onwards).
With their achievements, and not nearly the feminist remarks of the continuing the proportional equities to *”economies of scale”* — where their popularity mounts an appropriate “place” for them, in credit to their “*significant other*”. The difference is, that it is directly added to their credit — and not the kindness of their “patrons”: the agents, the enablers, and their mounting staff that must be needed to help out because of their (*individual, or collective*) weakness as a woman.
If this was the case, why was the cultural application a problem — when it is in the exacting of their qualifying for the roles that is actually the issue, rather than their inability to conjure the teams that protract their real potential — in actual time, or real time (from their own point of view).
Sometimes, there could be a girl-on-girl (gang) issue in industries, circles of startups, and lately, in tech-spaces, but i think we have more resolve to actuate a philosophy healthy enough for a real collective and collaborative, and intuitive **“international girl world”**.
